A9 9420 vs Celeron J4105
Description
The 9420 is based on Excavator architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 28.9 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.1 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 28.9 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.1 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
706a1
Core
Stoney Ridge
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2017
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
61.49k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
9420
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2.56k
1.68k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
9.97k
5.29k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.96k
2.75k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.12k
3.44k (x1.62)
TOTAL
17.61k
13.16k (x0.75)
Multithread
9420
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
6.39k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
9.26k
20.02k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
10.22k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.74k
4.94k (x2.84)
TOTAL
18.79k
41.57k (x2.21)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9420
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
8.41k
4.9k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
11.48k
7.26k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.29k
2.75k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.24k
3.32k (x1.48)
TOTAL
25.41k
18.22k (x0.72)
Multithread
9420
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
11.25k
18.84k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
13.69k
27.45k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.09k
10.35k (x4.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.87k
4.85k (x2.6)
TOTAL
28.89k
61.49k (x2.13)
Performance/W
9420
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
750 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
912 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
139 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
1926 points/W
6149 points/W
Performance/GHz
9420
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2336 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3188 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
913 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
621 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
7058 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4