A9 9420 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Description
The 9420 is based on Excavator architecture while the E2160 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 28.9 k points while the E2160 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 2.2 times faster than the E2160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 28.9 k points while the E2160 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 2.2 times faster than the E2160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
6f2
Core
Stoney Ridge
Allendale
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1024 kB
Date
April 2017
June 2007
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
7k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
12.87k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
9420
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
2.56k
1.81k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
9.97k
1.81k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.96k
1.79k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.12k
1.16k (x0.55)
TOTAL
17.61k
6.58k (x0.37)
Multithread
9420
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
3.62k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
9.26k
3.61k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
3.59k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.74k
1.19k (x0.68)
TOTAL
18.79k
12.01k (x0.64)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9420
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
8.41k
2.08k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
11.48k
1.88k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.29k
1.89k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.24k
1.16k (x0.52)
TOTAL
25.41k
7k (x0.28)
Multithread
9420
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
11.25k
4.16k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
13.69k
3.74k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.09k
3.78k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.87k
1.19k (x0.64)
TOTAL
28.89k
12.87k (x0.45)
Performance/W
9420
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
750 points/W
64 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
912 points/W
58 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
139 points/W
58 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
1926 points/W
198 points/W
Performance/GHz
9420
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
2336 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3188 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
913 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
621 points/GHz
643 points/GHz
TOTAL
7058 points/GHz
3891 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4