A9 9420 vs Ryzen 3 3350U
Description
The 9420 is based on Excavator architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 46.3 k points while the 3350U gets 123.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 2.7 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 46.3 k points while the 3350U gets 123.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 2.7 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
810f81
Core
Stoney Ridge
Picasso
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2017
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
36.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
123.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9420
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.74k
11.2k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
16.05k
18.26k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
3.99k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
3.03k (x1.48)
TOTAL
33.09k
36.47k (x1.1)
Multithread
9420
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
39.7k (x2.14)
Test#2 (FP)
20.11k
66.52k (x3.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
14.48k (x2.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
2.6k (x1.09)
TOTAL
46.33k
123.3k (x2.66)
Performance/W
9420
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
1238 points/W
2646 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1340 points/W
4435 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
352 points/W
966 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
159 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
3089 points/W
8220 points/W
Performance/GHz
9420
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
3260 points/GHz
3200 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4458 points/GHz
5217 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
905 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
570 points/GHz
865 points/GHz
TOTAL
9192 points/GHz
10421 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4