A9 9420 vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The 9420 is based on Excavator architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 46.3 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3250U is 1.7 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 46.3 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3250U is 1.7 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
810f81
Core
Stoney Ridge
Dali
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2017
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
77.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9420
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.74k
9.33k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
16.05k
17.1k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
3.57k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
3.26k (x1.59)
TOTAL
33.09k
33.26k (x1.01)
Multithread
9420
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
22.14k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
20.11k
40.04k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
10.71k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
5k (x2.1)
TOTAL
46.33k
77.88k (x1.68)
Performance/W
9420
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1238 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1340 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
352 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
159 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
3089 points/W
5192 points/W
Performance/GHz
9420
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3260 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4458 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
905 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
570 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
9192 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4