A9 9420 vs Mobile 3020e
Description
The 9420 is based on Excavator architecture while the 3020e is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 46.3 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3020e is 1.1 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 46.3 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3020e is 1.1 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
820f01
Core
Stoney Ridge
Dali
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2017
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
29.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
52.42k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9420
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
11.74k
9.28k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
16.05k
14.56k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
3.44k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
2.06k (x1)
TOTAL
33.09k
29.34k (x0.89)
Multithread
9420
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
15.75k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
20.11k
28.63k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
5.87k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
2.17k (x0.91)
TOTAL
46.33k
52.42k (x1.13)
Performance/W
9420
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
1238 points/W
2625 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1340 points/W
4771 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
352 points/W
979 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
159 points/W
361 points/W
TOTAL
3089 points/W
8737 points/W
Performance/GHz
9420
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
3260 points/GHz
3570 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4458 points/GHz
5602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
905 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
570 points/GHz
792 points/GHz
TOTAL
9192 points/GHz
11287 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4