A8 9600 vs N100
Description
The 9600 is based on Excavator architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9600 gets a score of 92.5 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 9600 is 1 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9600 gets a score of 92.5 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 9600 is 1 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
b06e0
Core
Bristol Ridge
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2016
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
32.75k points
36.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.52k points
88.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
11.66k
15.23k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
11.04k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.33k
5.54k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
4.98k (x1.78)
TOTAL
32.75k
36.79k (x1.12)
Multithread
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
38.61k
37.07k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
38.92k
32.57k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.57k
14.75k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.43k
3.9k (x1.14)
TOTAL
92.52k
88.29k (x0.95)
Performance/W
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
594 points/W
6178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
599 points/W
5429 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
178 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
649 points/W
TOTAL
1423 points/W
14715 points/W
Performance/GHz
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
3429 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4400 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
824 points/GHz
1464 points/GHz
TOTAL
9632 points/GHz
10821 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4