A8 9600 vs Core i7-7820HQ
Description
The 9600 is based on Excavator architecture while the i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9600 gets a score of 92.5 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 2.1 times faster than the 9600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9600 gets a score of 92.5 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 2.1 times faster than the 9600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
906e9
Core
Bristol Ridge
Kaby Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2016
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
32.75k points
55.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.52k points
196.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9600
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
11.66k
23.23k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
20.13k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.33k
4.57k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
7.92k (x2.82)
TOTAL
32.75k
55.85k (x1.71)
Multithread
9600
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
38.61k
85.54k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
38.92k
87.07k (x2.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.57k
20.37k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.43k
3.57k (x1.04)
TOTAL
92.52k
196.55k (x2.12)
Performance/W
9600
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
594 points/W
1901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
599 points/W
1935 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
178 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
1423 points/W
4368 points/W
Performance/GHz
9600
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3429 points/GHz
5956 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4400 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/GHz
1172 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
824 points/GHz
2030 points/GHz
TOTAL
9632 points/GHz
14321 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4