| | | | | | |

A8 9600 vs Core i5-6300HQ


Description
The 9600 is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-6300HQ is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9600 gets a score of 92.5 k points while the i5-6300HQ gets 135.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-6300HQ is 1.5 times faster than the 9600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
660f51
506e3
Core
Bristol Ridge
Skylake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2016
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
32.75k points
40.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.52k points
135.14k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9600
i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
11.66k
17.99k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
15.61k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.33k
3.56k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
3.83k (x1.37)
TOTAL
32.75k
40.99k (x1.25)

Multithread

9600

i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
38.61k
64.95k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
38.92k
54.01k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.57k
11.9k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.43k
4.29k (x1.25)
TOTAL
92.52k
135.14k (x1.46)

Performance/W
9600
i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
594 points/W
1443 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
599 points/W
1200 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
178 points/W
264 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
95 points/W
TOTAL
1423 points/W
3003 points/W

Performance/GHz
9600
i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3429 points/GHz
5622 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4400 points/GHz
4878 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/GHz
1113 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
824 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
TOTAL
9632 points/GHz
12808 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4