A8 9600 vs Core i3-10105
Description
The 9600 is based on Excavator architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9600 gets a score of 92.5 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 2.7 times faster than the 9600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9600 gets a score of 92.5 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 2.7 times faster than the 9600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
a0653
Core
Bristol Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2016
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
32.75k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.52k points
253.93k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9600
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
11.66k
28.9k (x2.48)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
25.85k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.33k
5.88k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
8.29k (x2.96)
TOTAL
32.75k
68.92k (x2.1)
Multithread
9600
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
38.61k
111.69k (x2.89)
Test#2 (FP)
38.92k
110.23k (x2.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.57k
28.45k (x2.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.43k
3.56k (x1.04)
TOTAL
92.52k
253.93k (x2.74)
Performance/W
9600
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
594 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
599 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
178 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
1423 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
9600
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3429 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4400 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
824 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
9632 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4