A8 5500 vs Core i5-10300H
Description
The 5500 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 52.1 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.8 times faster than the 5500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 52.1 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.8 times faster than the 5500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f01
a0652
Core
Trinity
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2012
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
22.25k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.13k points
246.07k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5500
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
8.61k
15.65k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
23.13k (x3.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.1k
5.66k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
11.43k (x3.5)
TOTAL
22.25k
55.87k (x2.51)
Multithread
5500
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.76k
26.77k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
18.75k
43.81k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
10.17k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
11.91k (x2.9)
TOTAL
52.13k
92.66k (x1.78)
Performance/W
5500
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
304 points/W
595 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
289 points/W
974 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
146 points/W
226 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
63 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
802 points/W
2059 points/W
Performance/GHz
5500
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2326 points/GHz
3477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1968 points/GHz
5141 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
883 points/GHz
2540 points/GHz
TOTAL
6014 points/GHz
12415 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4