A8 5500 vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The 5500 is based on Piledriver architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 52.1 k points while the 2400G gets 188.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.6 times faster than the 5500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 52.1 k points while the 2400G gets 188.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.6 times faster than the 5500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f01
810f10
Core
Trinity
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2012
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
22.25k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.13k points
198.27k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5500
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
8.61k
13.04k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
22.35k (x3.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.1k
5.37k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
3.4k (x1.04)
TOTAL
22.25k
44.15k (x1.98)
Multithread
5500
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
19.76k
56.49k (x2.86)
Test#2 (FP)
18.75k
100.74k (x5.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
28.21k (x2.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
3.04k (x0.74)
TOTAL
52.13k
188.49k (x3.62)
Performance/W
5500
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
304 points/W
869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
289 points/W
1550 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
146 points/W
434 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
63 points/W
47 points/W
TOTAL
802 points/W
2900 points/W
Performance/GHz
5500
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2326 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1968 points/GHz
5731 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
1376 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
883 points/GHz
871 points/GHz
TOTAL
6014 points/GHz
11321 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4