A8 5500 vs Athlon X4 760K
Description
Both models 5500 and 760K are based on Piledriver architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 52.1 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500 is 1 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 52.1 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500 is 1 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f01
610f31
Core
Trinity
Richland
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
100 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
4x16+2x64 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
kB
Date
October 2012
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
22.25k points
24.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.13k points
49.8k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5500
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
8.61k
9.53k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
8.14k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.1k
3.45k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
3.48k (x1.06)
TOTAL
22.25k
24.6k (x1.11)
Multithread
5500
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
19.76k
18.2k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
18.75k
19.33k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
8.42k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.11k
3.86k (x0.94)
TOTAL
52.13k
49.8k (x0.96)
Performance/W
5500
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
304 points/W
182 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
289 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
146 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
63 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
802 points/W
498 points/W
Performance/GHz
5500
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
2326 points/GHz
2324 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1968 points/GHz
1986 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
842 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
883 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
TOTAL
6014 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4