A6 9220e vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The 9220e is based on Excavator architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 15.4 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 15.4 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
306f2
Core
Stoney Ridge
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FT4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/2
12/24
TDP
6 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
30720 kB
Date
June 2017
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
22.34k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.39k points
452.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9220e
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
7.84k
18.62k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
10.54k
10.49k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.27k
4.04k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
3.26k (x1.92)
TOTAL
22.34k
36.41k (x1.63)
Multithread
9220e
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
11.42k
236.25k (x20.69)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
151.05k (x12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.62k
58.9k (x16.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
6.7k (x3.78)
TOTAL
29.39k
452.9k (x15.41)
Performance/W
9220e
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1903 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2097 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
603 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
4898 points/W
3774 points/W
Performance/GHz
9220e
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3265 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4390 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
709 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
9309 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4