A6 9220e vs Xeon E3-1220 v3
Description
The 9220e is based on Excavator architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 4.8 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 4.8 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
306c3
Core
Stoney Ridge
Haswell-WS
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FT4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/2
4 /4
TDP
6 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2017
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
22.34k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.39k points
140.76k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9220e
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
7.84k
19.17k (x2.45)
Test#2 (FP)
10.54k
10.55k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.27k
4.79k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
4.65k (x2.73)
TOTAL
22.34k
39.16k (x1.75)
Multithread
9220e
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
11.42k
73.13k (x6.41)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
42.06k (x3.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.62k
18.03k (x4.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
7.54k (x4.25)
TOTAL
29.39k
140.76k (x4.79)
Performance/W
9220e
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1903 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2097 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
603 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
4898 points/W
1759 points/W
Performance/GHz
9220e
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3265 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4390 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
709 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
9309 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4