| | | | | | |

A6 9220e vs Core i5-4460


Description
The 9220e is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-4460 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the i5-4460 gets 140.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4460 is 4.8 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
670f00
306c3
Core
Stoney Ridge
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FT4
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
6 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2017
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
22.34k points
39.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.39k points
140.27k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9220e
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
7.84k
19.84k (x2.53)
Test#2 (FP)
10.54k
10.86k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.27k
4.46k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
4.39k (x2.58)
TOTAL
22.34k
39.53k (x1.77)

Multithread

9220e

i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
11.42k
75.08k (x6.58)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
42.36k (x3.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.62k
16.38k (x4.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
6.45k (x3.63)
TOTAL
29.39k
140.27k (x4.77)

Performance/W
9220e
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
1903 points/W
894 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2097 points/W
504 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
603 points/W
195 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
4898 points/W
1670 points/W

Performance/GHz
9220e
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
3265 points/GHz
5834 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4390 points/GHz
3193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
709 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
TOTAL
9309 points/GHz
11628 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4