| | | | | | |

A6 9220e vs Core i3-5005U


Description
The 9220e is based on Excavator architecture while the i3-5005U is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the i3-5005U gets 55 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-5005U is 1.9 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
670f00
306d4
Core
Stoney Ridge
Broadwell-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FT4
Cores/Threads
2/2
2 /2
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2017
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
22.34k points
25.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.39k points
54.99k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9220e
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.84k
11.08k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
10.54k
9.5k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.27k
2.51k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
2.52k (x1.48)
TOTAL
22.34k
25.61k (x1.15)

Multithread

9220e

i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.42k
23.11k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
22.79k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.62k
6.06k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
3.03k (x1.71)
TOTAL
29.39k
54.99k (x1.87)

Performance/W
9220e
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
1903 points/W
1541 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2097 points/W
1519 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
603 points/W
404 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
202 points/W
TOTAL
4898 points/W
3666 points/W

Performance/GHz
9220e
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
3265 points/GHz
5541 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4390 points/GHz
4749 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
709 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
TOTAL
9309 points/GHz
12804 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4