A6 9220e vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The 9220e is based on Excavator architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3250U is 2.6 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3250U is 2.6 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
810f81
Core
Stoney Ridge
Dali
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FT4
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2017
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
22.34k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.39k points
77.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9220e
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.84k
9.33k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
10.54k
17.1k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.27k
3.57k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
3.26k (x1.92)
TOTAL
22.34k
33.26k (x1.49)
Multithread
9220e
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.42k
22.14k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
40.04k (x3.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.62k
10.71k (x2.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
5k (x2.82)
TOTAL
29.39k
77.88k (x2.65)
Performance/W
9220e
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1903 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2097 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
603 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
4898 points/W
5192 points/W
Performance/GHz
9220e
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3265 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4390 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
709 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
9309 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4