A6 9210 vs Xeon E5-2660 v2
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 16.9 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 16.9 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
306e4
Core
Stoney Ridge
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/2
10 /20
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
25600 kB
Date
June 2016
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
19.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
459.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9210
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
7.26k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
11.03k
6.9k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.77k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
2.55k (x1.04)
TOTAL
20.78k
19.48k (x0.94)
Multithread
9210
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
8.43k
180.2k (x21.38)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
191.43k (x14.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
80.22k (x24.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
7.46k (x2.89)
TOTAL
27.13k
459.31k (x16.93)
Performance/W
9210
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
562 points/W
1897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
853 points/W
2015 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
221 points/W
844 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
1809 points/W
4835 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1683 points/GHz
2420 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3938 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
927 points/GHz
923 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
873 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
7420 points/GHz
6495 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4