A6 9210 vs Core 2 Duo T5800
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the T5800 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the T5800 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 2 times faster than the T5800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the T5800 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 2 times faster than the T5800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
6fd
Core
Stoney Ridge
Meron
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
PGA 478
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2048 kB
Date
June 2016
October 2008
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
7.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
12.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9210
T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
4.87k
2.29k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
10.38k
2.05k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
1.96k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
1.07k (x0.45)
TOTAL
20.22k
7.37k (x0.36)
Multithread
9210
T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
4.28k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
3.8k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
3.59k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
1.23k (x0.47)
TOTAL
25.23k
12.91k (x0.51)
Performance/W
9210
T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
494 points/W
122 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
792 points/W
108 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
103 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
1682 points/W
369 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
1740 points/GHz
1145 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3707 points/GHz
1023 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/GHz
980 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
537 points/GHz
TOTAL
7222 points/GHz
3684 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4