A6 9210 vs Core i5-5200U
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the i5-5200U gets 50.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 1.9 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the i5-5200U gets 50.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 1.9 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
306d4
Core
Stoney Ridge
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
2/2
2 /4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2016
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
68.69k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9210
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
8.48k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
11.03k
12.03k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
3.32k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
2.79k (x1.14)
TOTAL
20.78k
26.62k (x1.28)
Multithread
9210
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.43k
15.19k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
25.99k (x2.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
6.71k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
2.96k (x1.14)
TOTAL
27.13k
50.85k (x1.87)
Performance/W
9210
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
562 points/W
1013 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
853 points/W
1733 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
221 points/W
447 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
197 points/W
TOTAL
1809 points/W
3390 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1683 points/GHz
3140 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3938 points/GHz
4455 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
927 points/GHz
1231 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
873 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
TOTAL
7420 points/GHz
9860 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4