A6 9210 vs Core i5-10400T
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the i5-10400T gets 235.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 8.7 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the i5-10400T gets 235.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 8.7 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
a0653
Core
Stoney Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2016
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
307.18k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9210
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.87k
12.61k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
10.38k
17.94k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
4.83k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
10.81k (x4.54)
TOTAL
20.22k
46.19k (x2.28)
Multithread
9210
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
74.62k (x10.07)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
119.63k (x10.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
32.65k (x9.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
2.52k (x0.97)
TOTAL
25.23k
229.42k (x9.09)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9210
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
12.5k (x2.65)
Test#2 (FP)
11.03k
19.05k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
4.72k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
10.3k (x4.21)
TOTAL
20.78k
46.57k (x2.24)
Multithread
9210
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.43k
74.58k (x8.85)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
126.96k (x9.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
31.76k (x9.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
2.5k (x0.97)
TOTAL
27.13k
235.8k (x8.69)
Performance/W
9210
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
562 points/W
2131 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
853 points/W
3627 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
221 points/W
907 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
1809 points/W
6737 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1683 points/GHz
3472 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3938 points/GHz
5292 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
927 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
873 points/GHz
2860 points/GHz
TOTAL
7420 points/GHz
12936 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4