A6 9210 vs Celeron N5105
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 2.5 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 2.5 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
906c0
Core
Stoney Ridge
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2016
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9210
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
4.87k
9.83k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
10.38k
9.74k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
3.65k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
3.88k (x1.63)
TOTAL
20.22k
27.1k (x1.34)
Multithread
9210
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
25.04k (x3.38)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
24.7k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
9.29k (x2.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
5.06k (x1.94)
TOTAL
25.23k
64.09k (x2.54)
Performance/W
9210
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
494 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
792 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
1682 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
1740 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3707 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
7222 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4