A6 9210 vs E2 Series 3800
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the 3800 is based on Jaguar.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the 3800 gets 22.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 1.2 times faster than the 3800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the 3800 gets 22.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 1.2 times faster than the 3800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
700f01
Core
Stoney Ridge
Kabini
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.3 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
FT3
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2048 kB
Date
June 2016
January 2014
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
6.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
22.52k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9210
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
2.24k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
11.03k
2.13k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
1.23k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
0.92k (x0.38)
TOTAL
20.78k
6.52k (x0.31)
Multithread
9210
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
8.43k
8.61k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
8.13k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
4.61k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
1.17k (x0.45)
TOTAL
27.13k
22.52k (x0.83)
Performance/W
9210
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
562 points/W
574 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
853 points/W
542 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
221 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
1809 points/W
1501 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
1683 points/GHz
1725 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3938 points/GHz
1640 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
927 points/GHz
943 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
873 points/GHz
708 points/GHz
TOTAL
7420 points/GHz
5016 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4