A6 9210 vs Athlon II M300
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the M300 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the M300 gets 17.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 1.4 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the M300 gets 17.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 1.4 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
100f62
Core
Stoney Ridge
Caspian
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
Socket S1G3
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
June 2016
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
9.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
17.73k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9210
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
4.87k
2.66k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
10.38k
3.84k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
1.97k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
1.1k (x0.46)
TOTAL
20.22k
9.57k (x0.47)
Multithread
9210
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
5.04k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
7.46k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
3.75k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
1.48k (x0.57)
TOTAL
25.23k
17.73k (x0.7)
Performance/W
9210
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
494 points/W
144 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
792 points/W
213 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
1682 points/W
506 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
1740 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3707 points/GHz
1921 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
550 points/GHz
TOTAL
7222 points/GHz
4784 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4