| | | | | | |

A6 7400K vs Xeon E5-4640


Description
The 7400K is based on Steamroller architecture while the E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7400K gets a score of 34.3 k points while the E5-4640 gets 610.2 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 17.8 times faster than the 7400K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
630f01
206d7
Core
Kaveri
Sandy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2+
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/2
8 /16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x16+64 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
20480 kB
Date
July 2014
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
24.01k points
13.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
34.28k points
610.16k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
7400K
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
8.78k
5.01k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
9.45k
4.5k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.39k
2.18k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.39k
2.19k (x0.92)
TOTAL
24.01k
13.88k (x0.58)

Multithread

7400K

E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
13.5k
251.29k (x18.61)
Test#2 (FP)
12.17k
236.61k (x19.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.96k
114.89k (x19.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.65k
7.36k (x2.78)
TOTAL
34.28k
610.16k (x17.8)

Performance/W
7400K
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
208 points/W
2645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
187 points/W
2491 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92 points/W
1209 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
527 points/W
6423 points/W

Performance/GHz
7400K
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
2252 points/GHz
1790 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2423 points/GHz
1609 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
869 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
612 points/GHz
782 points/GHz
TOTAL
6156 points/GHz
4957 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4