A6 7310 vs Xeon E5-4640
Description
The 7310 is based on Puma architecture while the E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7310 gets a score of 35.9 k points while the E5-4640 gets 610.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 17 times faster than the 7310. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7310 gets a score of 35.9 k points while the E5-4640 gets 610.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 17 times faster than the 7310. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
730f01
206d7
Core
Carrizo-L
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
FP4
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/4
8 /16
TDP
25 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
20480 kB
Date
May 2015
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
11.17k points
13.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
35.87k points
610.16k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
7310
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
4.08k
5.01k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
3.76k
4.5k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.21k
2.18k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.12k
2.19k (x1.95)
TOTAL
11.17k
13.88k (x1.24)
Multithread
7310
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
13.38k
251.29k (x18.78)
Test#2 (FP)
13.51k
236.61k (x17.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.39k
114.89k (x15.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.59k
7.36k (x4.63)
TOTAL
35.87k
610.16k (x17.01)
Performance/W
7310
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
535 points/W
2645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
540 points/W
2491 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
296 points/W
1209 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
1435 points/W
6423 points/W
Performance/GHz
7310
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
1700 points/GHz
1790 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1566 points/GHz
1609 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
921 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
467 points/GHz
782 points/GHz
TOTAL
4654 points/GHz
4957 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4