A6 7310 vs E1 2500
Description
The 7310 is based on Puma architecture while the 2500 is based on Jaguar.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7310 gets a score of 35.9 k points while the 2500 gets 9.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 7310 is 3.9 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7310 gets a score of 35.9 k points while the 2500 gets 9.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 7310 is 3.9 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
730f01
700f01
Core
Carrizo-L
Kabini
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.4 GHz
Socket
FP4
Socket FT3
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
25 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
kB
Date
May 2015
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
11.17k points
6.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
35.87k points
9.13k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
7310
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.08k
2.35k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
3.76k
2.21k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.21k
1.24k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.12k
0.84k (x0.75)
TOTAL
11.17k
6.64k (x0.59)
Multithread
7310
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
13.38k
3.3k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
13.51k
3.21k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.39k
1.76k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.59k
0.87k (x0.55)
TOTAL
35.87k
9.13k (x0.25)
Performance/W
7310
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
535 points/W
220 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
540 points/W
214 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
296 points/W
117 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
1435 points/W
609 points/W
Performance/GHz
7310
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
1700 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1566 points/GHz
1581 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
921 points/GHz
885 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
467 points/GHz
600 points/GHz
TOTAL
4654 points/GHz
4745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4