A6 3600 vs Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Description
The 3600 is based on K10 architecture while the 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 44.1 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.2 times faster than the 7c Gen 2. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 44.1 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.2 times faster than the 7c Gen 2. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
f4a
Core
Llano
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.55 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.55 GHz
Socket
Socket FM1
-
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
65 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x64 kB
- kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
- kB
Cache L3
0 kB
- kB
Date
August 2011
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
12.01k points
16.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.12k points
37k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3600
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
4.03k
3.87k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
4.25k
8.17k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.19k
2.67k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.54k
1.82k (x1.18)
TOTAL
12.01k
16.53k (x1.38)
Multithread
3600
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.66k
3.46k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
16.66k
22.59k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.33k
8.09k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
2.85k (x0.82)
TOTAL
44.12k
37k (x0.84)
Performance/W
3600
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
241 points/W
495 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
256 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128 points/W
1156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
407 points/W
TOTAL
679 points/W
5286 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
1680 points/GHz
1516 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1770 points/GHz
3205 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
913 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
642 points/GHz
712 points/GHz
TOTAL
5006 points/GHz
6481 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4