A6 3600 vs Xeon E3-1230 v5
Description
The 3600 is based on K10 architecture while the E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 44.1 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 37.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.2 times faster than the E3-1230 v5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 44.1 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 37.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.2 times faster than the E3-1230 v5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
506e3
Core
Llano
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
Socket FM1
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x64 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2011
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
12.01k points
9.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.12k points
37.88k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3600
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
4.03k
2.59k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
4.25k
3.94k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.19k
1k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.54k
2k (x1.29)
TOTAL
12.01k
9.52k (x0.79)
Multithread
3600
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
15.66k
10.4k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
16.66k
16.64k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.33k
4.51k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
6.33k (x1.82)
TOTAL
44.12k
37.88k (x0.86)
Performance/W
3600
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
241 points/W
130 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
256 points/W
208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128 points/W
56 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
679 points/W
474 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
1680 points/GHz
681 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1770 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
913 points/GHz
263 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
642 points/GHz
525 points/GHz
TOTAL
5006 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4