A6 3600 vs Celeron N4120
Description
The 3600 is based on K10 architecture while the N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 44.1 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N4120 is 1 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 44.1 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N4120 is 1 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
706a8
Core
Llano
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FM1
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x64 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2011
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
12.01k points
18.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.12k points
46.17k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3600
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
4.03k
5.94k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
4.25k
7.51k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.19k
2.78k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.54k
2.67k (x1.74)
TOTAL
12.01k
18.9k (x1.57)
Multithread
3600
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
15.66k
15.02k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
16.66k
19.77k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.33k
7.71k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
3.67k (x1.06)
TOTAL
44.12k
46.17k (x1.05)
Performance/W
3600
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
241 points/W
2503 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
256 points/W
3294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128 points/W
1286 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
611 points/W
TOTAL
679 points/W
7694 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
1680 points/GHz
2286 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1770 points/GHz
2887 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
913 points/GHz
1069 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
642 points/GHz
1029 points/GHz
TOTAL
5006 points/GHz
7271 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4