A6 3600 vs Celeron 4205U
Description
The 3600 is based on K10 architecture while the 4205U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 44.1 k points while the 4205U gets 37.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.2 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 44.1 k points while the 4205U gets 37.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.2 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
806ec
Core
Llano
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
Socket FM1
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2011
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
12.01k points
20.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.12k points
37.61k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3600
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.03k
6.53k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
4.25k
9.46k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.19k
2.28k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.54k
2.34k (x1.52)
TOTAL
12.01k
20.61k (x1.72)
Multithread
3600
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.66k
12.97k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
16.66k
18.12k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.33k
4.33k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
2.18k (x0.63)
TOTAL
44.12k
37.61k (x0.85)
Performance/W
3600
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
241 points/W
865 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
256 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128 points/W
289 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
146 points/W
TOTAL
679 points/W
2507 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
1680 points/GHz
3629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1770 points/GHz
5255 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
913 points/GHz
1269 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
642 points/GHz
1298 points/GHz
TOTAL
5006 points/GHz
11451 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4