A6 3600 vs Ryzen 5 3500U
Description
The 3600 is based on K10 architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 44.1 k points while the 3500U gets 149.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 3.4 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 44.1 k points while the 3500U gets 149.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 3.4 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
810f81
Core
Llano
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket FM1
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x64 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2011
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
12.01k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.12k points
140.97k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3600
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.03k
11.98k (x2.97)
Test#2 (FP)
4.25k
15.85k (x3.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.19k
4.53k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.54k
3.29k (x2.14)
TOTAL
12.01k
35.65k (x2.97)
Multithread
3600
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.66k
48.28k (x3.08)
Test#2 (FP)
16.66k
74.19k (x4.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.33k
23.29k (x2.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
3.47k (x1)
TOTAL
44.12k
149.23k (x3.38)
Performance/W
3600
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
241 points/W
3219 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
256 points/W
4946 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128 points/W
1553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
231 points/W
TOTAL
679 points/W
9949 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1680 points/GHz
3238 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1770 points/GHz
4283 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
913 points/GHz
1224 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
642 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
TOTAL
5006 points/GHz
9634 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4