A6 3600 vs A4 3310MX
Description
Both models 3600 and 3310MX are based on K10 architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 44.1 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 2.7 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 44.1 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 2.7 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
300f10
Core
Llano
Llano
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket FM1
Socket FS1
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x64 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
August 2011
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
12.01k points
11.4k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.12k points
16.5k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3600
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
4.03k
3.98k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
4.25k
4k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.19k
2.05k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.54k
1.37k (x0.89)
TOTAL
12.01k
11.4k (x0.95)
Multithread
3600
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
15.66k
5.74k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
16.66k
6.05k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.33k
2.85k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
1.86k (x0.54)
TOTAL
44.12k
16.5k (x0.37)
Performance/W
3600
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
241 points/W
128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
256 points/W
134 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128 points/W
63 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
679 points/W
367 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
1680 points/GHz
1593 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1770 points/GHz
1602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
913 points/GHz
818 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
642 points/GHz
547 points/GHz
TOTAL
5006 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4