A6 3500 vs Xeon E5472
Description
The 3500 is based on K10 architecture while the E5472 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500 gets a score of 32.7 k points while the E5472 gets 48.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5472 is 1.5 times faster than the 3500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500 gets a score of 32.7 k points while the E5472 gets 48.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5472 is 1.5 times faster than the 3500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
10676
Core
Llano
Harpertown
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket FM1
LGA-771
Cores/Threads
3/3
4/4
TDP
65 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
3x64+3x64 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
3x1024 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
August 2011
November 2007
Mean monothread perf.
13.65k points
16.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.72k points
48.62k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3500
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
4.75k
2.88k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
4.72k
6.36k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
2.55k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.69k
4.83k (x2.86)
TOTAL
13.65k
16.62k (x1.22)
Multithread
3500
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
12.56k
11.19k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
24.85k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
10.04k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.49k
2.54k (x1.7)
TOTAL
32.72k
48.62k (x1.49)
Performance/W
3500
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
193 points/W
140 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
194 points/W
311 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
93 points/W
125 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
23 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
503 points/W
608 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
1978 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1966 points/GHz
2119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1039 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
704 points/GHz
1610 points/GHz
TOTAL
5686 points/GHz
5539 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4