A4 6300B vs Xeon E5-2660 v2
Description
The 6300B is based on Piledriver architecture while the E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300B gets a score of 27.5 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 16.7 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300B gets a score of 27.5 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 16.7 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
306e4
Core
Richland
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/2
10 /20
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x16+64 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
25600 kB
Date
December 2013
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
20.11k points
19.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
459.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300B
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
7.26k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
7.31k
6.9k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.95k
2.77k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.51k
2.55k (x1.69)
TOTAL
20.11k
19.48k (x0.97)
Multithread
6300B
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
180.2k (x16.56)
Test#2 (FP)
10.01k
191.43k (x19.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
80.22k (x15.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.63k
7.46k (x4.59)
TOTAL
27.54k
459.31k (x16.68)
Performance/W
6300B
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
167 points/W
1897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
154 points/W
2015 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
77 points/W
844 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
4835 points/W
Performance/GHz
6300B
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2140 points/GHz
2420 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1873 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
756 points/GHz
923 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
387 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
5157 points/GHz
6495 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4