| | | | | | |

A4 6300B vs Core i5-3337U


Description
The 6300B is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300B gets a score of 27.5 k points while the i5-3337U gets 48.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3337U is 1.8 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
610f31
306a9
Core
Richland
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/2
2 /2
TDP
65 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x16+64 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2013
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
20.11k points
23.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
48.3k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300B
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
8.64k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
7.31k
8.55k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.95k
3.42k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.51k
3.22k (x2.13)
TOTAL
20.11k
23.82k (x1.18)

Multithread

6300B

i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
17.28k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
10.01k
19.67k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
7.59k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.63k
3.75k (x2.31)
TOTAL
27.54k
48.3k (x1.75)

Performance/W
6300B
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
167 points/W
1017 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
154 points/W
1157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
77 points/W
447 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
221 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
2841 points/W

Performance/GHz
6300B
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
2140 points/GHz
3201 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1873 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
756 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
387 points/GHz
1191 points/GHz
TOTAL
5157 points/GHz
8824 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4