| | | | | | |

A4 6300B vs Core i7-7020U


Description
The 6300B is based on Piledriver architecture while the i7-7020U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300B gets a score of 27.5 k points while the i7-7020U gets 60.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7020U is 2.2 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
610f31
806ea
Core
Richland
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x16+64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2013
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
20.11k points
33.63k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
73.15k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300B
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
8.17k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
7.31k
12.42k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.95k
2.87k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.51k
4.68k (x3.1)
TOTAL
20.11k
28.13k (x1.4)

Multithread

6300B

i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
17.65k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
10.01k
30.44k (x3.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
7.19k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.63k
4.79k (x2.95)
TOTAL
27.54k
60.07k (x2.18)

Performance/W
6300B
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
167 points/W
1177 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
154 points/W
2029 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
77 points/W
479 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
320 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
4005 points/W

Performance/GHz
6300B
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
2140 points/GHz
3550 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1873 points/GHz
5399 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
756 points/GHz
1247 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
387 points/GHz
2035 points/GHz
TOTAL
5157 points/GHz
12231 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4