| | | | | | |

A4 6300B vs Core i3-2330M


Description
The 6300B is based on Piledriver architecture while the i3-2330M is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300B gets a score of 27.5 k points while the i3-2330M gets 33.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-2330M is 1.2 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
610f31
206a7
Core
Richland
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x16+64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2013
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
20.11k points
16.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
33.28k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300B
i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
5.61k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
7.31k
5.42k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.95k
2.45k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.51k
2.53k (x1.68)
TOTAL
20.11k
16.02k (x0.8)

Multithread

6300B

i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
11.99k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
10.01k
11.42k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.8k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.63k
4.07k (x2.5)
TOTAL
27.54k
33.28k (x1.21)

Performance/W
6300B
i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
167 points/W
343 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
154 points/W
326 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
77 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
951 points/W

Performance/GHz
6300B
i3-2330M
Test#1 (Integers)
2140 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1873 points/GHz
2465 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
756 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
387 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
TOTAL
5157 points/GHz
7281 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4