A4 6300B vs Core i3-2100
Description
The 6300B is based on Piledriver architecture while the i3-2100 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300B gets a score of 27.5 k points while the i3-2100 gets 40.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-2100 is 1.5 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300B gets a score of 27.5 k points while the i3-2100 gets 40.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-2100 is 1.5 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
206a7
Core
Richland
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x16+64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2013
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
20.11k points
19.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
40.1k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300B
i3-2100
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
7.07k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
7.31k
7.16k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.95k
2.62k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.51k
2.67k (x1.77)
TOTAL
20.11k
19.52k (x0.97)
Multithread
6300B
i3-2100
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
14.19k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
10.01k
15.19k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
7.26k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.63k
3.46k (x2.13)
TOTAL
27.54k
40.1k (x1.46)
Performance/W
6300B
i3-2100
Test#1 (Integers)
167 points/W
218 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
154 points/W
234 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
77 points/W
112 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
617 points/W
Performance/GHz
6300B
i3-2100
Test#1 (Integers)
2140 points/GHz
2279 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1873 points/GHz
2311 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
756 points/GHz
845 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
387 points/GHz
862 points/GHz
TOTAL
5157 points/GHz
6297 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4