| | | | | | |

A4 6300B vs A6 7310


Description
The 6300B is based on Piledriver architecture while the 7310 is based on Puma.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300B gets a score of 27.5 k points while the 7310 gets 35.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 7310 is 1.3 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
610f31
730f01
Core
Richland
Carrizo-L
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
FP4
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x16+64 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
kB
Date
December 2013
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
20.11k points
11.17k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
35.87k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300B
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
4.08k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
7.31k
3.76k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.95k
2.21k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.51k
1.12k (x0.74)
TOTAL
20.11k
11.17k (x0.56)

Multithread

6300B

7310
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
13.38k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
10.01k
13.51k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
7.39k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.63k
1.59k (x0.98)
TOTAL
27.54k
35.87k (x1.3)

Performance/W
6300B
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
167 points/W
535 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
154 points/W
540 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
77 points/W
296 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
1435 points/W

Performance/GHz
6300B
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
2140 points/GHz
1700 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1873 points/GHz
1566 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
756 points/GHz
921 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
387 points/GHz
467 points/GHz
TOTAL
5157 points/GHz
4654 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4