A4 5000 vs E2 Series 3800
Description
Both models 5000 and 3800 are based on Jaguar architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5000 gets a score of 24.7 k points while the 3800 gets 22.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5000 is 1.1 times faster than the 3800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5000 gets a score of 24.7 k points while the 3800 gets 22.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5000 is 1.1 times faster than the 3800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
700f01
700f01
Core
Kabini
Kabini
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
1.3 GHz
Socket
Socket FT3
FT3
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
May 2013
January 2014
Mean monothread perf.
7.38k points
6.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.71k points
22.52k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5000
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
2.58k
2.24k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
2.43k
2.13k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.39k
1.23k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.98k
0.92k (x0.94)
TOTAL
7.38k
6.52k (x0.88)
Multithread
5000
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
9.55k
8.61k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
8.66k
8.13k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
4.61k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
1.17k (x0.81)
TOTAL
24.71k
22.52k (x0.91)
Performance/W
5000
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
637 points/W
574 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
577 points/W
542 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
337 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
1647 points/W
1501 points/W
Performance/GHz
5000
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
1721 points/GHz
1725 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1620 points/GHz
1640 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
926 points/GHz
943 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
650 points/GHz
708 points/GHz
TOTAL
4917 points/GHz
5016 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4