A4 3310MX vs Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Description
The 3310MX is based on K10 architecture while the 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3310MX gets a score of 16.5 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 2.2 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3310MX gets a score of 16.5 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 2.2 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
f4a
Core
Llano
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.55 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.55 GHz
Socket
Socket FS1
-
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/8
TDP
45 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
- kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
- kB
Cache L3
kB
- kB
Date
June 2011
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
11.4k points
16.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.5k points
37k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3310MX
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
3.98k
3.87k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
4k
8.17k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.05k
2.67k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.37k
1.82k (x1.33)
TOTAL
11.4k
16.53k (x1.45)
Multithread
3310MX
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
5.74k
3.46k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
6.05k
22.59k (x3.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.85k
8.09k (x2.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.86k
2.85k (x1.53)
TOTAL
16.5k
37k (x2.24)
Performance/W
3310MX
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
128 points/W
495 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
134 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63 points/W
1156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
407 points/W
TOTAL
367 points/W
5286 points/W
Performance/GHz
3310MX
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
1593 points/GHz
1516 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1602 points/GHz
3205 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
547 points/GHz
712 points/GHz
TOTAL
4560 points/GHz
6481 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4