A4 3310MX vs Xeon X3430
Description
The 3310MX is based on K10 architecture while the X3430 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3310MX gets a score of 16.5 k points while the X3430 gets 55.7 k points.
Summarizing, the X3430 is 3.4 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3310MX gets a score of 16.5 k points while the X3430 gets 55.7 k points.
Summarizing, the X3430 is 3.4 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
106e5
Core
Llano
Lynnfield
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket FS1
LGA1156
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2011
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
11.4k points
15.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.5k points
55.66k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3310MX
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
3.98k
6.41k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
4k
4.27k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.05k
2.38k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.37k
2.67k (x1.95)
TOTAL
11.4k
15.74k (x1.38)
Multithread
3310MX
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
5.74k
25.19k (x4.39)
Test#2 (FP)
6.05k
16.76k (x2.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.85k
9.33k (x3.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.86k
4.37k (x2.35)
TOTAL
16.5k
55.66k (x3.37)
Performance/W
3310MX
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
128 points/W
265 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
134 points/W
176 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63 points/W
98 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
367 points/W
586 points/W
Performance/GHz
3310MX
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
1593 points/GHz
2288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1602 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/GHz
852 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
547 points/GHz
954 points/GHz
TOTAL
4560 points/GHz
5621 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4