A4 3310MX vs Xeon E5645
Description
The 3310MX is based on K10 architecture while the E5645 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3310MX gets a score of 16.5 k points while the E5645 gets 77 k points.
Summarizing, the E5645 is 4.7 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3310MX gets a score of 16.5 k points while the E5645 gets 77 k points.
Summarizing, the E5645 is 4.7 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
206c2
Core
Llano
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket FS1
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
6 /6
TDP
45 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2011
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
11.4k points
15.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.5k points
76.96k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3310MX
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
3.98k
6.47k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
4k
4.4k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.05k
2.43k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.37k
2.33k (x1.71)
TOTAL
11.4k
15.64k (x1.37)
Multithread
3310MX
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
5.74k
34.43k (x6)
Test#2 (FP)
6.05k
24.23k (x4.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.85k
14.48k (x5.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.86k
3.81k (x2.05)
TOTAL
16.5k
76.96k (x4.66)
Performance/W
3310MX
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
128 points/W
430 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
134 points/W
303 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63 points/W
181 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
367 points/W
962 points/W
Performance/GHz
3310MX
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
1593 points/GHz
2311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1602 points/GHz
1573 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/GHz
867 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
547 points/GHz
833 points/GHz
TOTAL
4560 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4