A4 3310MX vs Pentium P6200
Description
The 3310MX is based on K10 architecture while the P6200 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3310MX gets a score of 16.5 k points while the P6200 gets 22.9 k points.
Summarizing, the P6200 is 1.4 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3310MX gets a score of 16.5 k points while the P6200 gets 22.9 k points.
Summarizing, the P6200 is 1.4 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
20655
Core
Llano
Arrandale
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
Socket FS1
Socket G1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2011
September 2010
Mean monothread perf.
11.4k points
12.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.5k points
22.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3310MX
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
3.98k
5.29k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
4k
3.55k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.05k
2.1k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.37k
1.8k (x1.32)
TOTAL
11.4k
12.74k (x1.12)
Multithread
3310MX
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
5.74k
10.06k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
6.05k
6.74k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.85k
3.96k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.86k
2.16k (x1.16)
TOTAL
16.5k
22.91k (x1.39)
Performance/W
3310MX
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
128 points/W
287 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
134 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63 points/W
113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
62 points/W
TOTAL
367 points/W
655 points/W
Performance/GHz
3310MX
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
1593 points/GHz
2478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1602 points/GHz
1667 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
547 points/GHz
845 points/GHz
TOTAL
4560 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4