A4 3310MX vs Core 2 Duo E8200
Description
The 3310MX is based on K10 architecture while the E8200 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3310MX gets a score of 16.5 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E8200 is 1.5 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3310MX gets a score of 16.5 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E8200 is 1.5 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
10676
Core
Llano
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
Socket FS1
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
June 2011
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
11.4k points
15.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.5k points
25.39k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3310MX
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
3.98k
3k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
4k
6.62k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.05k
2.55k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.37k
3.6k (x2.63)
TOTAL
11.4k
15.77k (x1.38)
Multithread
3310MX
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
5.74k
5.83k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
6.05k
12.64k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.85k
4.97k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.86k
1.95k (x1.05)
TOTAL
16.5k
25.39k (x1.54)
Performance/W
3310MX
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
128 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
134 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63 points/W
76 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
367 points/W
391 points/W
Performance/GHz
3310MX
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
1593 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1602 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
547 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
4560 points/GHz
5912 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4