A4 3310MX vs Core 2 Duo E6600
Description
The 3310MX is based on K10 architecture while the E6600 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3310MX gets a score of 16.5 k points while the E6600 gets 16.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3310MX is 1 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3310MX gets a score of 16.5 k points while the E6600 gets 16.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3310MX is 1 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
6f6
Core
Llano
Conroe
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket FS1
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
June 2011
July 2006
Mean monothread perf.
11.4k points
9.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.5k points
16.12k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3310MX
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.98k
2.7k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
4k
2.42k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.05k
2.41k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.37k
2.46k (x1.8)
TOTAL
11.4k
9.99k (x0.88)
Multithread
3310MX
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
5.74k
5.19k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
6.05k
4.55k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.85k
4.6k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.86k
1.78k (x0.96)
TOTAL
16.5k
16.12k (x0.98)
Performance/W
3310MX
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
128 points/W
80 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
134 points/W
70 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63 points/W
71 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
367 points/W
248 points/W
Performance/GHz
3310MX
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1593 points/GHz
1125 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1602 points/GHz
1009 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
547 points/GHz
1025 points/GHz
TOTAL
4560 points/GHz
4164 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4