A4 3310MX vs Athlon II M300
Description
Both models 3310MX and M300 are based on K10 architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3310MX gets a score of 16.5 k points while the M300 gets 17.7 k points.
Summarizing, the M300 is 1.1 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3310MX gets a score of 16.5 k points while the M300 gets 17.7 k points.
Summarizing, the M300 is 1.1 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
100f62
Core
Llano
Caspian
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket FS1
Socket S1G3
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
kB
Date
June 2011
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
11.4k points
9.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.5k points
17.73k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3310MX
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
3.98k
2.66k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
4k
3.84k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.05k
1.97k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.37k
1.1k (x0.8)
TOTAL
11.4k
9.57k (x0.84)
Multithread
3310MX
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
5.74k
5.04k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
6.05k
7.46k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.85k
3.75k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.86k
1.48k (x0.79)
TOTAL
16.5k
17.73k (x1.07)
Performance/W
3310MX
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
128 points/W
144 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
134 points/W
213 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63 points/W
107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
367 points/W
506 points/W
Performance/GHz
3310MX
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
1593 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1602 points/GHz
1921 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
547 points/GHz
550 points/GHz
TOTAL
4560 points/GHz
4784 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4