A4 3310MX vs Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Description
The 3310MX is based on K10 architecture while the 4200+ is based on K8.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3310MX gets a score of 16.5 k points while the 4200+ gets 17.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4200+ is 1.1 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3310MX gets a score of 16.5 k points while the 4200+ gets 17.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4200+ is 1.1 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
40fb2
Core
Llano
Brisbane
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
Socket FS1
Socket AM2
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
June 2011
January 2007
Mean monothread perf.
11.4k points
9.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.5k points
17.83k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3310MX
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
3.98k
2.88k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
4k
3.98k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.05k
2k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.37k
0.72k (x0.52)
TOTAL
11.4k
9.57k (x0.84)
Multithread
3310MX
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
5.74k
5.58k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
6.05k
7.67k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.85k
3.88k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.86k
0.7k (x0.38)
TOTAL
16.5k
17.83k (x1.08)
Performance/W
3310MX
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
128 points/W
86 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
134 points/W
118 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63 points/W
60 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
11 points/W
TOTAL
367 points/W
274 points/W
Performance/GHz
3310MX
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
1593 points/GHz
1308 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1602 points/GHz
1807 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/GHz
911 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
547 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
4560 points/GHz
4352 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4