A4 3310MX vs A9 9420
Description
The 3310MX is based on K10 architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3310MX gets a score of 16.5 k points while the 9420 gets 28.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 1.8 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3310MX gets a score of 16.5 k points while the 9420 gets 28.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 1.8 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
670f00
Core
Llano
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FS1
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
June 2011
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
11.4k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.5k points
46.33k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3310MX
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
3.98k
8.41k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
4k
11.48k (x2.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.05k
3.29k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.37k
2.24k (x1.64)
TOTAL
11.4k
25.41k (x2.23)
Multithread
3310MX
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
5.74k
11.25k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
6.05k
13.69k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.85k
2.09k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.86k
1.87k (x1)
TOTAL
16.5k
28.89k (x1.75)
Performance/W
3310MX
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
128 points/W
750 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
134 points/W
912 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63 points/W
139 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
367 points/W
1926 points/W
Performance/GHz
3310MX
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
1593 points/GHz
2336 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1602 points/GHz
3188 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/GHz
913 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
547 points/GHz
621 points/GHz
TOTAL
4560 points/GHz
7058 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4